‘The good man is the friend of all living things’ – Wilfred Owen analysis

The good man is the friend of all living things” ~ Mahatma Ghandi

Focus: In what ways does Wilfred Owen present his thoughts and feelings about war through nature and agricultural language in his poem ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ and other selected works?

Wilfred Owen, regarded as being the leading poet for the First World War, is eminent for his blunt and unequivocal views on war he is exceptionally successful in conveying the harsh reality and brutality of not just World War One but of war on a universal scale. In his poem ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ Owen passes judgement on his experience of war and uses the poem as a lament for the dead. Written in a sonnet format with a rhyme scheme very close to that of Shakespeare’s, ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’s’ form reflects Owens’s anger with its use of irony through the sonnet format – commonly associated with a love poem, Owen uses the sonnet form ironically. The title of the poem suggests this idea of irony through the use of ‘Doomed Youth’ as a double conflict with common a connation of ‘Youth’ not being ‘Doomed’

One of Owens’ most used techniques is his ability to convey his thoughts through the idea of nature and agricultural language. Owen was believed to be greatly influenced by Romantic poets such as Keats and therefore we see that nature plays a significant role in Owens’ works. In ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ Owen compares soldiers to the treatment of cattle in farming markets; ‘What passing -bells for these who die as cattle’. This immediately compares the young soldiers to the slaughter of animals and provokes the idea that these men are being treated like animals. The use of the ‘cattle’ adds to the poem as a whole as it plays on Owens’ original idea that war dehumanises people. Owen uses this agricultural langue as England was largely an agrarian county at this time also it reminds of Owens’ rural upbringing.

This idea of war dehumanising people can also be seen in Owens’ ‘Arms and the Boy’ where we see the idea of nature and creation being compared to the unnatural actions of war. In this poem Owen conveys how the weapons and soldier are not only in a partnership but the weapon seems to be controlling the young ‘boy’ this can be seen through the personification of the blades ‘hunger for blood’. Whilst it has been claimed that ‘Children were much in Owens’ mind'[1] During Easter 1919 when he wrote this poem I feel that Owen is more concerned with the proliferation of weapons and how young recruits respond to having them is Owens’ concern in this poem. This is shown through the contrast between natural and manmade objects that Owen uses in ‘Arms and the Boy’.  In the third stanza we see that Owen contrasts the natural weapons of animals against the unnaturalness of war and weapons; ‘And God will grow no talons at his heels’ here Owen reminds us of the difference in purpose, provoking the idea that man made weapons are associated with grief and death – killing for killings  sake.

The idea of how young recruits respond to weapons can also be seen in the sound devices used. Alliteration is used in close triplets to imitate the noise created by the use of the weapons; ‘blind, blunt, bullet-heads’ the repetition of this ‘b’ sound reflects the harsh sound made by the weapons being used. It is these triplets of sounds that govern the rhythm of the poem rather than the actual syllables in each line. This alliteration can also be seen in Owens’ ‘Miners’ where he discusses the idea of these soldiers sacrificing themselves for civilians at home to be able to live comfortably; ‘murmuring of their mine, and moans’ Owen uses this alliteration to create sound as he develops the idea and image of those who have died in tunnel collapses. We see that in ‘Miners’ Owen takes upon the Big Bang Theory and earth pre-mankind, this can be seen in the first stanza with Owens’ reference to ‘a former earth’. In this stanza we see Owen discuss the time it has taken to create earthly materials such as coal.

It is with reference to ‘a former earth’ that then links with one of Owens’ most famous poem, ‘Futility’  resembling the form of a sonnet however split into two seven line stanzas ‘Futility’ depicts the scene of a soldier who has recently died in battle. Owen seems to ponder nature’s power to create life and how this contrasts to the mass killings in war. We see in the opening that Owen creates a scene; in this case it is one of a dying or perhaps already dead soldier. He uses the sun metaphorically in which he hangs his thoughts. ‘Move him into the sun’ this can be seen to the reader as a command however we feel that the movement must be gentle just as we feel the command has been quietly spoken. Owen then moves onto personify the sun as its ‘touch’ awakens the soldier. We see that in the first stanza Owen again uses the idea of nature and agricultural language, and in this particular poem he uses the semantic field of farming with the use of words such as ‘fields’ and ‘seeds’  this then gives an ironic contrast as we feel that nature itself is now turning on mankind.

In ‘Futility’ Owen personifies the sun as it awakens the soldier, a similar technique can also be seen in ‘The Show’ where an environmental hell is depicted with Owens’ personification of the battle field; ‘warts that might be little hills’ From this we are given the grotesque sights of the battle field which subsequently puts in shock with what was endured and suffered from soldiers. The form of ‘The Show’  takes up irregular and illogical stanzas, however with the use of half-rhyme although separated lines they share one rhyming couplet, for example lines 10 -13; ‘hill/holes’ This use of half rhyme can also be seen in ‘Exposure’ where Owen continues his use of landscape and nature when discussing the brutality of war; ‘silent/salient’ Owen here uses half-rhyme and also the harsh sound of ‘s‘ to depict the conditions faced by these soldiers and how the weather itself has now become an enemy.

In conclusion Owen takes on the idea of the Romantics by using landscape, nature and agricultural language in many pieces of his work. He compares and contrasts the image of nature to that of the war and using this to show the treatment of soldiers and the sickening actions. I feel that with his use of agricultural language Owen successfully shocks the reader into the reality of war and subsequently opens our minds to realise what has been and is still being fought for.

Advertisements